martes, 1 de septiembre de 2026
BuscarExplore
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
News articleMIT Technology Review

Scaling AI agents with trustworthy data

View original at technologyreview.com
MIT Technology Review - Ai Research Title: Scaling AI agents with trustworthy data Date: 2026-08-12 16:51 Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/08/12/1141032/scaling-ai-agents-with-trustworthy-data/ <p>Business and technology leaders need no convincing that the time of agentic AI is here…
Opening lines of the source · MIT Technology Review · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

Lo que extrajimos de esta fuente

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • AI agents will augment or automate 50% of business decisions by 2027.

    60% confidence
  • Within two years, 100% of respondents plan to be using agentic AI, with 69% expecting to use it widely.

    60% confidence
  • In organizations categorized as 'data laggards', AI access to company data falls to 30% or less.

    60% confidence
  • Two-thirds of data laggards say legacy data systems limit AI agent scaling (66%) and prevent agents from making decisions at speed (68%), versus just 8% of data leaders reporting either constraint.

    60% confidence
  • Only around half of surveyed organizations trust that the decisions their AI agents make are accurate and relevant, whereas 100% of data leaders trust their agents' decisions.

    60% confidence
  • Across all surveyed organizations, AI only has access to an average of 45% of company data.

    60% confidence
  • A select group of 'data leaders' ensures access to over 70% of their data and has greater success with agents.

    60% confidence
  • The most important initiative to enable scaling among all respondents is improving access to structured and unstructured data for AI agents, followed by enhancing data and AI governance with business context; data leaders are also focusing heavily on automation of data management.

    60% confidence

Citado en estos reportajes de Via News

Lo que sabemos · la inteligencia detrás de esta página
En vivo desde el sustrato
Lo que estamos viendo
AI Capital Surge: Late-August 2026 Funding Wave Spans Fintech, Enterprise Agents, and Robotics
A dense cluster of funding rounds landing on 2026-08-28 — from identity/fraud fintech player Socure ($156M plus its acquisition of Fravity) to enterprise AI agent startups (Instinct, Generalist AI, Owner), model infrastructure (Stability AI, Emerald AI), and autonomous logistics/aerospace (Gatik, Regent Craft) — signals investors are rotating aggressively into AI-native companies with demonstrable ROI, especially in financial risk/compliance and back-office automation. Parallel signals (Multiverse Computing's compression benchmarks cutting inference cost/latency, and Arkestro/CloneOps.ai publishing hard savings and labor-displacement figures) suggest the funding is chasing efficiency and measurable economic impact rather than pure model scale.
Nuestra lectura de los datos ›
Señales que seguimos
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patrones que observamos ›
Donde las fuentes discrepan
ING Group
Both facts record the same metric (shares_outstanding) for ING Group at the identical observation date (2025-12-31). FACT A states 2,902,437,688 shares; FACT B states 2,902 million shares (2,902,000,000). The difference is 437,688 shares (~0.015%). This is a genuine value conflict, though the discrepancy appears to result from FACT B rounding to the nearest million while FACT A provides the precise count.
Señalamos los conflictos abiertamente ›
Verificado recientemente
Verificado con la fuente original
4,980
hechos rastreados a su fuente — y señalamos los que no se sostienen.
101 entidades seguidas4,980 hechos verificados con la fuente5,267 documentos fuente archivados
Consulta estos datos → isubstrate.com