martes, 29 de septiembre de 2026
BuscarExplore
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· January 22, 2026

D-Wave (QBTS) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

View original at finance.yahoo.com
D-Wave (QBTS) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Image source: The Motley Fool. Date Thursday, November 6, 2025 at 8 a.m. ET Call participants Chief Executive Officer — Alan Baratz Chief Financial Officer — John Markovich Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst?…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

Lo que extrajimos de esta fuente

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • 60%+ of D-Wave's patent portfolio is applicable to both annealing and gate systems

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave can reach profitability with less funding than competitors

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is the only company building both annealing and gate model quantum systems

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave Advantage2 is 1,000x faster than IBM classical and quantum approaches on multi-objective optimization problems while finding higher quality solutions

    80% confidence
  • QCaaS annual capacity exceeds $100M

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave's strong cash position enables organic growth plus M&A opportunities

    80% confidence
  • North Wales Police achieved 90%+ incidents within target response time, 50% reduction in average response time, and coordination time reduction from 4 months to 4 minutes

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is 1,000x faster than unnamed ion trap company on same problems, while ion trap performs only as good as classical (not better)

    80% confidence
  • Government R&D funding model is not a sustainable business model for quantum computing

    80% confidence
  • Advantage3 testing expected Q4 2025

    80% confidence
  • Superconducting gate qubits are 1,000-10,000x faster than ion trap, neutral atom, and photonic approaches

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is only quantum system showing better-than-classical results while others frequently have downtime with multi-hour queue delays

    80% confidence
  • Japan Tobacco Pharmaceutical achieved subsecond responses, improved LLM training performance vs classical, and more valid generated molecules vs classical-only approaches

    80% confidence
  • Scaled error-corrected gate model system has a 5-10 year timeline

    80% confidence
  • Superconducting technology leverages 50 years of IC manufacturing experience, established supply chains, faster scaling, and lower cost compared to alternatives

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is the only quantum company with production-ready applications today

    80% confidence
  • Davidson partnership would result in first quantum computer certified for classified government work

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave has 100+ revenue-generating customers in trailing 4 quarters and approximately 24 Forbes Global 2000 customers

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave Advantage2 is the only quantum computer demonstrating supremacy on useful real-world problem

    80% confidence
  • Cryogenic control technology is a unique competitive advantage for D-Wave

    80% confidence
  • BASF achieved production scheduling reduction from 10 hours to seconds, latency reduction of 14%, setup time reduction of 9%, and tank unloading duration reduction of 18%

    80% confidence
  • Q4 2025 bookings to date exceed $12M

    80% confidence
  • Q-Alliance Italy system purchase price range is $20M-40M if full purchase option exercised

    80% confidence
  • There has been a shift from foreign-only to U.S. government attention on D-Wave

    80% confidence
  • First gate model demonstration expected within coming year (2026)

    80% confidence

Data points we hold from this source

D-Wave Quantum Inc. · warrant remeasurement charge121.9 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · adjusted eps-0.17 USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · adjusted net loss18.1 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · bookings growth qoq80 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · bookings growth yoy3 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · customer count100 customers
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · gaap gross margin71.4 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · gaap gross profit2.7 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · noncash charges260 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · non gaap gross margin77.7 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · non gaap gross profit2.9 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · outstanding warrants count5 millions
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · outstanding warrants value58 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · patent portfolio dual applicability60 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · post q3 warrant proceeds21.3 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · q4 bookings ytd12 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · qcaas annual capacity100 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · systems revenue15.5 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · warrant proceeds40.3 million_USD
Lo que sabemos · la inteligencia detrás de esta página
En vivo desde el sustrato
Lo que estamos viendo
The Agentic Takeover of the CFO's Office
Enterprise finance software vendors—BlackLine, OneStream, Numero AI, and Oracle—are racing to embed autonomous AI agents into core financial operations (close, consolidation, reporting), backed by consolidation M&A (Numero-Royu, BlackLine-WiseLayer), fresh leadership hires, and survey data showing nearly a quarter of CFOs plan to boost AI spending over 50%. Adoption momentum is strong even as at least one bellwether (Oracle) sees its stock lag year-to-date, suggesting the market hasn't yet fully priced in the shift from AI-as-feature to AI-as-agent in finance.
Nuestra lectura de los datos ›
Señales que seguimos
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Patrones que observamos ›
Donde las fuentes discrepan
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Two significantly different EPS values (10.21 vs 2.68 USD_per_share) are reported for Morgan Stanley on the same observation date (2025-12-31). Fact A specifies FY 2025, while Fact B's 'N/A' fiscal period is ambiguous. If both represent FY 2025 annual EPS, these values directly conflict. The magnitude of the difference (3.8x) is too large to attribute to rounding or minor calculation variations. The missing fiscal period in Fact B raises data quality concerns, but same-date observation + same attribute should reference the same period.
Señalamos los conflictos abiertamente ›
Verificado recientemente
✓ Verificado con la fuente original
4,984
hechos rastreados a su fuente — y señalamos los que no se sostienen.
101 entidades seguidas4,984 hechos verificados con la fuente5,314 documentos fuente archivados
Consulta estos datos → isubstrate.com